implement « serialize « Java I/O Q&A





1. Java classes that implement the Serializable interface    stackoverflow.com

I need a list of classes that implement Serializable. Could you also tell me what kind of classes implement that interface?

2. Why do transfer objects need to implement Serializable?    stackoverflow.com

I realized today that I have blindly just followed this requirement for years without ever really asking why. Today, I ran across a NotSerializableException with a model object I created ...

3. Java serialization library without need of no-arg constructors and implementation of Serializable    stackoverflow.com

Is there is any way in java-world to serialize without need of no-arg constructors and implementation of Serializable?

4. Classes implementing Serializable    stackoverflow.com

When we develop a class in java, the decision of whether you should make the class serializable or not is usually simple. If the class represents a model object that may ...

5. When should we implement Serializable interface?    stackoverflow.com

package 

public class Contact implements Serializable  {

 private String name;
 private String email;


 public String getName() {
        return name;
    }

 ...

6. Implementing my own serialization in java    stackoverflow.com

How can i implement serialization on my own.Meaning i dont want my class to implement serializable.But i want to implement serialization myself.So that without implementing serializable i can transfer objects over ...

7. How to implement Serialization in java    stackoverflow.com

Hi i'm looking for any open source available to implement the best in class serialization. I'm talking about , Is there any opensource(which is popular) which handles the serialization better .

8. With out implementing a Serializable interface is it possible to make a class persistable in java?    stackoverflow.com

In Java we implement an interface Serializable that defines no method (also called a marker interface). But suppose I have an interface without any method just like a Serializable interface, can I ...

9. Which classes must implement the Serializable interface?    stackoverflow.com

I want to send an object via socket, so I have to implement Serializable. But my class is a compound class, like this simple code:

class B{
    private int ...





10. What are the pros and cons of using serialVersionUID and @SuppressWarnings("serial") on classes implementing Serializable?    stackoverflow.com

This question has been the subject of some lively discussions in my team. My personal choice is to use

@SuppressWarnings("serial")
My thoughts are that it means there is one less thing to ...

11. implementing Serializable    coderanch.com

12. Implementing serializable interface for reference class    coderanch.com

Hi All, I am using a class "CustomValidate.java" in my application. As it is one of the ResultClass (Struts), I have implemented the Serializable interface in the "CustomValidate.java". But still it throws java.io.Serialization exception? I read from the net that all the class referred inside the Serializable class also needs to implement the Serializable interface to make the object Serializable. My ...

13. should an interface implement Serializable    coderanch.com

Yes, if Class Bar encapsulates another object that doesn't implement Serializable, Bar can no longer be Serialized even though it extends Foo which extends Serializable. public interface Foo extends Serializable{ } public class NonSerial{ private int ns; public void setNs(int i){ this.ns = i; } public int getNs(){ return ns; } } public class Bar implements Foo{ private NonSerial ns; } ...

15. y to implement serializable in getter & setter ?    coderanch.com

The data you are going to set or get using getter or setter method some times may need to pass through network from one remote to another remote system.Serializable is property that allows you to write the data or the object state into an output stream and fetch it back from there...

16. Serializing an object with out implementing Serializable    coderanch.com

I am not sure whether its an intermediate question... Is there any way to make an object serializable or writing its current state in OutputStream with out implementing the Serializable interface. I came across Object's clone method and it use to make an exact copy of the object can that be used to do perform that operation. Thanks in advance, Jerry. ...





17. Cost of implementing Serialization    coderanch.com

if not used properly, serialization causes problems. some of them are static variables- serializing static variables doesn't make sense and may create bugs in program. please see this link http://forums.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=710356&messageID=4112234 security - If a class contains information which has to be secured from outside world, like password as text or employee salaries, a malicious program might be able to read them ...

18. Is serialization implementation may cause inadequate heap size memory?    coderanch.com

An ObjectOutputStream needs a cache of every object you write to it, so that if you write the same object again, it can substitute a reference to the earlier object, rather than writing a new copy. You'd think that ObjectOutputStream would use WeakReferences in that table, but it does not. Therefore, if you keep an ObjectOutputStream open for a long time, ...

19. What if I dont implement the serializable interface ?    coderanch.com

I am just going to add one more thing, because you mentioned Servlets in your original post. When you are using Servlets there is a lot of work done behind the scenes to make sure the web application works in a memory efficient manner. With some configurations that could mean sending user data from one server to another or storing user ...

20. Implementing Serializable    coderanch.com

21. Is there any cost associated with the implementation of Serializable interface?    coderanch.com

We know that, if we anticipate objects are passed by value over a remote method calls, or should we choose to serialize/deserialize the objects or want to save the object as a bytes to some file (and many other usecases), we are required to have our class implement Serializable. But lately I was just curious, if any cost is associated with ...

22. why we need to implement serializable to save our objects ?    coderanch.com

Serializable is a "marker interface". If you implement it, then Java understands that objects of that class are meant to be serialized. Serialization works by special handling by the JVM. It's not really an elegant solution, but that's what the Java and JVM designers chose long ago when they invented Java. I think that if they'd have to invent it again, ...

23. Do I need to implement Serializable inteface.    coderanch.com

Hi all, I am calling a web service using AXIS. I have stubs code which has multiple DTO extends Serializable interface. I have also same kind of DTOs layer which extract data from presentation layer and populate the DTOs generated by Axis and send across to web-service provider. Everything is working fine. My question is that do I need to implement ...

24. Problem with NotSerializableException on class implementing Serializable    forums.oracle.com

Unfortunately, letting NumberStore (the enclosing class) implement Serializable did not have any effect. It would have surprised me somewhat, had it helped - I never save or load objects of that type, only the User object, shown above. It does not include any references to the NumberStore it is part of, only two strings, with getters and setters. So, my question ...